Defective Hip Replacement System Manufacturers

There are quite a few different types of hip replacement systems that have failed as the result of defective design or manufacture, including many metal-on-metal hip replacement systems. These medical devices have been manufactured by a number of different companies, including:

Biomet – Manufacturer of hip replacement systems that have had dangerous health consequences for some patients, including the M2a Magnum;

Johnson & Johnson – This is the manufacturer of the DePuy ASR XL acetabular hip implant device and Pinnacle system, which are the subjects of extensive litigation;

Smith & Nephew –  Birmingham BHR hip replacement  & R3 Acetabular systems;

Stryker – Hip implant systems manufactured by Stryker have failed upon implantation in the body, including the ABG IIand Rejuvenate;

Wright Medical – Manufactured the Medical Pro Femur and Conserve Plus. In addition to hip replacement failure or defects impacting mobility, there has been corrosion of the metal components, leading to serious problems as the result of metal poisoning (called metallosis);

Zimmer Holdings – This manufacturer has recalled medical devices marketed under the Durom label because of problems with the cup surface in their hip implant systems. It is important for medical manufacturing companies to continue to strive for improvements in the devices that promote better quality of life for the individuals who receive them. Unfortunately, the rush to the next great thing has led to hip replacement systems that fail and lead to great suffering for the patients in which these medical devices are implanted. Many patients endure constant pain while others must suffer from the physical stress of another surgery in order to replace the failing hip replacement system.

KNEE MANUFACTURER RECALLS

Over 1 million people in the U.S. have knee replacement procedures performed each year.  As the population ages and obesity-related illnesses such as arthritis become more common, the demand for knee replacement devices continues to increase.  In addition, many of those reaching beyond retirement age continue to lead active lifestyles much longer than in previous years. 

Defective Design

Because of the increased demand and desires of potential knee-replacement patients, there is a corresponding need for innovation in the design of medical devices for joint replacement surgery.  Many devices have been designed with an intent to create a longer lasting device that is more suitable for a younger demographic who desires a more active lifestyle.  Unfortunately, despite the intention, many devices have shown early failure and have caused severe injuries in some patients. 

1000’s of Lawsuits Filed

Lawsuits have been filed against large medical device manufacturers such as DePuy Orthopedics, Zimmer Holdings, Smith & Nephew, Stryker Orthopedics and Biomet, by patients who have experienced severe side effects due to knee replacement devices.  Thousands of lawsuits have already been filed but many more are expected.